News

​Before some heavy articles come up, let’s all take a moment to have a little fun and talk about some great bike wear that is either high quality or more ‘blue collar’ in pricing or both.

While an article is forthcoming regarding IMBA and some things that are going  on, IMBA has a new survey for mountain bikers, members and non-members alike.   Its important to take the 10-15 minutes to fill this survey because:

• It helps IMBA define who is who and what they are interested in
• For the first time in a long time, this survey asks for priorities for IMBA, which seems to indicate they are looking at some re-focusing; including...
• A fair amount of questions regarding Wilderness, back-country access 
• So real questions about eMTBs that could help IMBA redefine their stance on eMTBs

All in all, there are a lot of questions in the survey that need answering by all of us if we are to help steer IMBA. 

The survey can be found here:   https://ohio.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_e8ugn6H4uebaBRH

​We’ve all heard it, “I’m not an anti-mountain biker, I just think that…”  Or maybe you have heard “calling me an anti-mountain biker is a pejorative”.
​
That raises some questions, of course.  What is an anti-mountain biker and anti-mountain biking?  Is it a pejorative to say a person or group is anti-mountain bike?  If it is not a pejorative, why should anti-mountain biking persons and groups be correctly identified?

“Be a team player.”  You probably have heard that phrase from the first years of your schooling.  It’s almost always used in conjunction with the idea that doing a project or activity with others will produce a better result.  Whether that is always true is debatable.

But the one area where collaboration can produce positive results is in the field of urban mountain biking public meetings and in trail layout.  And there is one method that manages to take both those disparate parts of the process and combine them.  That method is known as Collaborative Ecological Layout.
​
Why should we consider this method?  What is Collaborative Ecological Layout?  How does it solve many of the issues common to mountain biking trail proposals in urban areas?

Signs and symbols are a specific part of graphic arts, called iconography.  Merriam-Webster defines iconography as:

1. pictorial material relating to or illustrating a subject
2. the traditional or conventional images or symbols associated with a subject and especially a religious or legendary subject
3. the imagery or symbolism of a work of art, an artist, or a body of art

​Trails, just like any other infrastructure conveying human beings, need signage of some kind to help direct users and get them to be aware of various realities on the trail.  But bad signage can be as bad (or worse sometimes) then no signage.

So how can a trail system do trail signage right?  What can help direct users without overloading them?

Much thanks to Matthew B.  of the San Francisco Urban Riders for helping to fill out some great riding locations in and around San Francisco, CA to add to the Trails Inventory.

Much thanks to Matthew for the additional information.  If you have a trail system or  mountain biking park you think should be included, let us know about it and we will add it.

Because every update  needs an accompanying song, I think we only have one choice, Jude Garland singing "San Francisco".    Yeah,  a bit of stereotype there, but as stereotypes go, a pretty harmless one.

Sometimes, life gives you lemons.  Sometimes, it backs a truck up to your front door and dumps lemons till your house bursts.

CityMTB is not dead, it just took a back seat for a bit.  New content (and some spicey takes)  starting Monday.

Your bike, just like you, needs a wash after it plays in the dirt.

Yet, bike wash stations at local trails can be all too rare.  Why then are bike wash stations an important part of the infrastructure for urban trails?  What styles of bike wash stations are there?  How do you get one?
​
Get your sponges out and suds up as we dive into bike wash stations!

In part 1 of this series, we discussed what active and passive recreational uses were and how they are defined.

As we discussed, to be a passive use, the activity would have to meet 3 criteria:

1. Have no greater impact than other passive uses
2. Use the same recreational facilities as other passive uses
3. Can occur with other passive activities and users simultaneously

As point #2 illustrates, it’s not only the activity, but the infrastructure of that recreational use that would be a factor in determining if an activity could be considered passive or active.  The example used in the previous article was that of a football field and a multi-use trail.

However, if we have a trail, in this case multi-use, could an activity come along might not be passive use?  And where does mountain biking, as an activity, fit in with the idea of active and passive use?

That will be some of the questions we will answer in this second part.

In the discussion of scientific instruments and measuring devices, there are two major categories: active sensors and passive sensors.  Active sensors use some kind of directed energy, whether that be light waves, sound waves or kinetic means to measure properties about an item.   Passive sensors do not emit any energy, but measure the observed item's own emitted energy, again, light waves, sound waves or kinetic means to measure properties of that item.

Some types of instruments can be in either passive or active types. Microscopes can be passively viewing or, like an electron microscope, they can actively view.  Sonar on ships and submarines can do the same, passively listening for other vessels or sending out a “ping” to listen for the echo.

​​But when talking about active or passive recreational uses, what is being referred to?  How can one activity be referred to as “active use” and a seemingly similar activity be referred to as “passive use”.  How does this understanding of active and passive recreational use affect mountain biking in urban areas?